
Featured · client work
Law 25 is Quebec's private-sector privacy law. On a website it requires three visible things: a privacy policy published on the site in clear and simple language, a named person responsible for privacy with public contact details, and any technology that profiles or locates a visitor switched off until that visitor turns it on.
This is a plain-language summary, not legal advice. Rules change and thresholds get revised, so confirm anything you are relying on against the regulator's own page.
Law 25 follows the person, not the office. Any enterprise that collects personal information about someone in Quebec is covered, regardless of where the business is registered or how many people it employs. A Toronto roofer taking quote requests from Gatineau, or an Ontario retailer shipping to Montréal, is inside the law.
There is no small-business exemption and no employee threshold. That is the single most common misreading, because both PIPEDA guidance and Ontario's accessibility rules do carry thresholds.
A privacy policy, published on the site, written in clear and simple language rather than the copied template most sites carry. It has to say what is collected, why, who it is shared with, and whether anything leaves the province.
A person responsible for the protection of personal information, named on the site with a way to reach them. By default this is the person with the highest authority in the business, and the role can be delegated in writing, but the name and title have to be public.
Tracking technology off by default. Section 8.1 requires that any function that identifies, locates, or profiles a person be deactivated until the visitor is told about it and turns it on.
PIPEDA is the federal privacy law and works on meaningful consent, which in practice has allowed implied consent for ordinary analytics. It has no default-off rule and, until recently, very little enforcement teeth.
Loi 96 is a language law. It governs whether the French version is displayed as prominently as the English one and says nothing about data. The two get conflated because both arrived around the same time and both are enforced from Quebec, but a site can satisfy one and fail the other.
Collect only the fields that are genuinely needed to answer the enquiry, and say at the point of collection what the information will be used for. A phone number field marked required on a form that only ever gets answered by email is now a compliance question as well as a conversion one.
Consent boxes cannot be pre-ticked, and consent to be contacted about the enquiry is not consent to be added to a mailing list. Those are separate purposes and need separate agreement, which is also what CASL has required since 2014.
| Date | What it added |
|---|---|
| 22 September 2022 | A designated person responsible for privacy, a register of confidentiality incidents, and mandatory breach reporting |
| 22 September 2023 | The published privacy policy, express consent rules, tracking technology off by default, privacy impact assessments, and disclosure of automated decision-making |
| 22 September 2024 | The right to receive personal information back in a structured, commonly used technological format |
Send the link. We read the site by hand and write back inside five business days.
No call, no commitment